Zimmerman trial....

Discussion in 'Community Forum' started by WildmanWilson, Jun 30, 2013.

  1. aceoky

    aceoky 12 pointer

    Jul 14, 2003
    W KY
    Yeah whatever (ad nausem) I'm not going to show you what YOU SHOULD KNOW - IF you followed the actual trial and evidence IF you (like many) only going by the spin - well you can use Google I'm sure
  2. Strutter

    Strutter Cyber-Hunter

    Dec 9, 2001
    I think that some of us realize that Zimmerman also had lots of other options that night as well but chose not to use them.
  3. aceoky

    aceoky 12 pointer

    Jul 14, 2003
    W KY
    He chose to be a good neighbor and a good police witness- nothing wrong with that at all. It is funny right on here we all gripe about crime and NO one wants to get involved in making a difference - GZ wasn't like that and some try to find fault with that - WOW
  4. predator1

    predator1 12 pointer

    Dec 25, 2008
    Well, we've established all the "what ifs?" All the coulda, shoulda, woulda's..... But at the end of the day. None of us are TM or GZ. So there is no way for anyone of us to know how we would've reacted. You have to seperate your emotions and opinions from the story. A trial is to determine if a person is guilty of breaking laws. A jury decides this by looking at the evidence and facts. They are required to put their own personal emotions and feelings aside. And I challenge all of you that are on a witch hunt to point out exactly what law GZ broke?? Because he didn't! That's why he was found not guilty.
  5. ptbrauch

    ptbrauch 12 pointer

    Nov 10, 2004
    The OC
    Yep. And he was found to have not broken any laws, so a moot point.
  6. raktrakr

    raktrakr Cyber-Hunter

    Jan 20, 2002
    central ky
    Think "O.J.Simpson"
  7. aceoky

    aceoky 12 pointer

    Jul 14, 2003
    W KY
    OJ was sued in California (no immunity for self defense unlike the Fla statute I posted) also OJ never claimed self defense he said he didn't do it apples to jeeps

Share This Page