EdLongshanks
12 pointer
Or doesn’t….just sayin
This is the definition of pure white trash. No other definition. Embarrassing.
- Thread starter 120+
- Start date
drakeshooter
12 pointer
slobear
12 pointer
Unsurprisingly, james carville shares 120’s view.
aaronc
12 pointer
WildmanWilson
12 pointer
Look what we have. A 5-page thread on a loudmouth that speaks her mind. If she were like the others, you would not hear from her and she would fade into obscurity like all the others and be run over by the democrats like so many others. The democrats use every tactic possible to win and get their agenda pushed. And it works. Setting back and playing nice just gets you run over. It happens in every aspect of life if you let it.
HuntressOfLight
12 pointer
I'm pretty sure people are quite over loud mouths speaking their minds, especially after the last few presidents have set particularly poor examples of how to properly behave themselves. I really haven't paid her much attention, before she was elected and ever since then, but I can say the same for most politicians. I have seen only still frame shots of her last two recent blunders and was less than impressed with her antics. She does not appear to benefit the party with her behavior and should be privately dealt with by all in regards to it.
GodblessKy
8 pointer
I think its hilarious. I just wish you could here it in her whiny victim voice she has. Her voice could be a secrete weapon, no one could tolerate that loud whiney scream she has without surrendering.
Birds of a feather... One Fake loves another Fake. Perfect Match.
WildmanWilson
12 pointer
You say that but its not reality. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. I see it in daily life. Everyone works with the people that are loud and complain and seems they always get their way over the guy that comes in and just works and stays quite. On top of that the quite one is who gets the shaft most times. Its the same way in sports or in Hollywood or anywhere else. These people get noticed.
HuntressOfLight
12 pointer
It's not "reality", because you said so? Hahaha, okay (you almost always make more sense).
The current president cannot properly speak (reality). The previous president could not do so, either, and he spoke too much (reality). The one before those two was a radical Marxist whom could not remain quiet, either, always agitating everyone possible (reality). Three buffoons back to back. Regardless, not one of them should have ever been interrupted, while presenting the State of the Union.
Last edited:
drakeshooter
12 pointer
You’d have to be a damned idiot to be worrying about MTG.
slobear
12 pointer
Exactly. It’s telling of the ones that always seem to find a reason to dump on republicans but give a pass to the disgusting other side!
GodblessKy
8 pointer
It just goes to show that people would rather have an old guy who cant really talk well and does odd things over a Modern Republican. You need to rethink your platform.
slobear
12 pointer
That’s not odd that is sick you f***!
WildmanWilson
12 pointer
I don't think you understand. Just look at many of the people in public and they stand out for a reason. You know about certain people by name for this reason. How many other congressmen can you name? Maybe a few but most stand out because the our radical or loud in some way. If you are quietly standing in the shadows you don't get heard. It doesn't matter if you agree or not but these people will have a following.
HuntressOfLight
12 pointer
You will lose this debate. I really hate to admit that I fall upon the side of the OP with regards to this matter, simply because he can be a real moron at times, but his obvious frustration is warranted. You are grossly mistaken.
It is standard protocol to refrain from interrupting one, whom has the floor. When that one happens to hold the highest office within our land (world, for that matter and others closely monitor all...), such is an even more egregious act. All should have voiced objections immediately after the address. Reporters are always standing by afterwards, for such. I refuse to defend ill behavior within our party.
