Aluminum Duck Boats

Discussion in 'Waterfowl Hunting' started by turkey, Dec 5, 2011.

  1. turkey

    turkey 10 pointer

    1,300
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    16-20 ft aluminum boats pros and cons of each? I have no time use mine anymore so I will prob go back to a good ol 16 with tiller....interested in hearing opinions in my experience you need a garage full of kayaks and aluminum!
     
  2. mike_b

    mike_b 8 pointer

    869
    0
    Aug 8, 2010
    Ledbetter
    They had a 20 footer in stock at a dealer near me. Damn thing was 8 foot wide in the rear beam and the installed floor was big enough for a wooden picnic table. That's too big for me. Maybe if it were more narrow.
     
  3. turkey

    turkey 10 pointer

    1,300
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    20fts great river goose rigs!
     
  4. smashdn

    smashdn 12 pointer

    9,069
    132
    Nov 24, 2003
    Palmyra, Kentucky
    Big enough to be safe, small enough to hide.

    No boat is too big for running the two west KY oceans and Itall's river. But they might be too big to hide effectively or maneuver in timber.

    I run a 1752 side console with a 60 hp Yamahammer. Big enough to be safe on the lakes and river in most conditions (there are some times when no boat should be out, know when) but small enough to hide and maneuver in tight spots. It fits how and where I hunt.

    You might need way more boat, you may get by with less. You might need lots of speed, you might be better with the go-anywhere aspect of mud motor
     
  5. KYBH4Life

    KYBH4Life Banned

    7,411
    1
    Feb 13, 2011
    This is what I had...a Grizzly 2072...and I did not like it at all. I hated trailering it as it was wider than my truck and I only had like 6" on each side to stay in my lane. This was not good when I got caught between 2 semi's coming up from Tennessee. Also, it did not handle well on the water either. I do a lot of jugging and it took forever to turn the thing around. I downsized to what I think is perfect for me..an 1860. Oh, and it's a side console too. The 2072 was center console and I will never have another.

    However, it was stable as hell. You could walk around all you wanted and it would not rock at all.
     
  6. artcarney_agr

    artcarney_agr Banned

    1,703
    0
    Oct 9, 2007
    My dream duck rig is a Sea Ark....THICK hulls on those dudes with a lifetime warranty. An 1872 would be about right for me - I'd like to have a center console on it, but have it short enough that it wouldn't interfere with a blind.

    I haven't seen an F&F yet, but I keep hearing good things about those as well.

    I'm currently in a 1756 Lowe with a 40 hp tiller Yamaha - it gets the job done....for now anyways. Probably wouldn't get another one because the longer I own it, the more I dislike it.

    I don't like any of the Tracker brand/Grizzly....the quality just doesn't seem to be there.

    Of course, the biggest thing to consider is how you plan to use it. A timber hunter isn't going to want the same rig as a big lake/river hunter. Shoot, there's some places where a pontoon boat with a blind on it wouldn't be too bad of an idea.
     
  7. BootsOn27

    BootsOn27 6 pointer

    192
    0
    Oct 13, 2011
    16ft war eagle with 30 horse tiller. Gets me just about anywhere I need to go safely. But I dont hunt the big lakes.
     
  8. waterfowlmagnet

    waterfowlmagnet Fawn

    11
    0
    Jan 11, 2006
    I took my 2072 with a 4 stroke 90 out in the headwater to save a blind.....I love this boat in the river but trees and shallow water is not it's cup of tea. 1756 or 1860 with a 40-50 hp is a much better choice
     
  9. waterfowlmagnet

    waterfowlmagnet Fawn

    11
    0
    Jan 11, 2006
    And I'd probably go with a 2 stroke just for the weight savings, if I was only duck hunting out of it.
     
  10. mike_b

    mike_b 8 pointer

    869
    0
    Aug 8, 2010
    Ledbetter
    I thought the same thing, but a 2-cyl 40HP E-Tec is actually a little heavier than a 3-cyl 40HP Yam 4-stroke F40. Weird. I'd still go with a 2-stroke.
     
  11. turkey

    turkey 10 pointer

    1,300
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    Boats not as good as tool of the trade now with the backwater laws way they are now!
     
  12. mike_b

    mike_b 8 pointer

    869
    0
    Aug 8, 2010
    Ledbetter
    What is the new backwater law?
     
  13. turkey

    turkey 10 pointer

    1,300
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    You have to have rights to be on the water over the land under you that hunting or driving boat!
     
  14. mike_b

    mike_b 8 pointer

    869
    0
    Aug 8, 2010
    Ledbetter
    http://mhf.myhuntingandfishing.com/_Kentucky-Afield-Radio-92610/audio/787505/10577.html

    27 minutes in does a good explanation of the law. In the course of navigation there is the public right to use, even waterways that are not "commercially navigable" as the coast guard definition such as creeks and streams. Most of the streams, creeks and rivers in KY are privately owned under the water.

    There is also a good article on riparian rights which is a bit less clear.
    http://somerset-kentucky.com/opinion/x681521978/Public-dominion-of-Kentucky-waterways

    but to quote:
     
  15. Wonder Duck

    Wonder Duck Fawn

    19
    0
    Nov 17, 2011
    Just Curious,... has anyone ever tried using a jet ski to get into tricky shallow spots? Guess you would need a bit of camo work but sounds like it could be dynamite and a heck of alot easier to hide.
     

Share This Page